�

Here’s a QUITE GOOD COMMENT (sheez…) that I would like to react upon.

This comment came from a certain kel_1122@yahoo.com posting as Kabataan, akbayan muna (You are not sure which partylist are you?, whereas in the undisclosed sample ballots that the INC secretly distributed amongst cult members, ALAGAD was indicated as partlylist? and that your sample ballots are really clear directives of whom to support?)

kabataan, akbayan muna Comments:June 11th, 2007 at 10:25 am

kabataan, akbayan muna: ALAGAD Partylist is NOT AND WILL NEVER BE, the official party-list of the Iglesia ni Cristo. Nor will it attempt to be the official representative of the INC in ANY matter whatsoever pertaining to ANYTHING AT ALL.

el_critique: Yes, to deny all links to this group… sadly, if this group really had the clean intentions, then it would not be shameful to accept such fact that it is infact an INC initiative… but it would be shameful enough that ALAGAD would be a partylist that serves to the best interest of the INC Cult…�

kabataan, akbayan muna:�THE LAW IS VERY STRICT in a definite stipulation prohibiting religious organizations (or sectors) from participating in party-list elections. INC in general, is very particular with observing the RULE OF LAW. You should know this if and only if you do belong to the true Church.

el_critique: The Law is very strict to those who cannot afford it financially, cover-ups are best known options on these situations… INC generally is very particular with the RULE OF LAW for its own cruel intentions. No entity�claims to be the TRUE CHURCH (sic) except the INC.

kabataan, akbayan muna:��REVIEW THE SAME ARTICLE THAT YOU EXHIBITED TO FORTIFY YOUR CLAIM RE: ALAGAD’S PUTATIVE ASSOCIATION WITH THE INC. There is no mention that Brother Rodante Marcoleta indeed linked in any way whatsoever, the ALAGAD partylist with the INC. It did mention that Cong. Marcoleta was, is and will always be a member of the INC. There is nothing extravagant and befuddling about that. What is confusing is the manner by which you desperately insinuate INC’s connection with ALAGAD using the above premise.

el_critique: It was a featured article from josepherdon; then again, the said article verifies my source’s information. To as those sources came from, I have agreed to witheld their�identities and�designation in the INC.

kabataan, akbayan muna:�When ALAGAD won the chance to have a seat in the Congress on 1998. Diogenes Osabel represented ALAGAD. Again if you really are a member of the INC even back then, you may recall (or may ask an INC member who was old enough to vote then if you can’t) that INC voted for ALAGAD. MR. OSABEL, who was later on expelled out of the party, IS A NON-MEMBER OF THE INC. Why he was expelled is bereft of any religious considerations. Furthemore, other nominees following Cong. Marcoleta are also non-members of the INC. Shall you still make a HUGE deal out of Cong. Marcoleta’s membership with the INC?

el_critique:� Diogenes Osabel was a member duly expelled by your cult, whatever happened is not my business and I have no problem with that… Now that since Congressman Marcoleta is a member of the INC, isnt it that it is not allowed for an INC member to run into public office? I admire Cong. Marcoleta’s works in the Philippine congress… I just dont want that to be exploited for INC’s own intentions…but then again, it is really a big deal that an INC ran for public office…

kabataan, akbayan muna:�If you still have questions about this, you are enjoined to seek an advise from your locale pastor– that is again if you are a member of INC, that being said, you should be aware of to begin with.

kabataan, akbayan muna:�ERRATUM: 4. …ADVICE… (not advise)

el_critique:� My locale pastor? hmm… Number 1, I guess they would not tolerate such act and well, report me to the ultimate-spaceship of the INC in Commonwealth… Number 2, (I’d laugh about this…) Majority of my sources are from that spaceship (sic- As Ida would say, “Time Space Warp, ngayon din! ) Number 3, I don’t trust any locale pastor because merely of the fact that I know with some of them (Well, almost all of them are involved into serious acts of deceit and lasiviousness, which will be tackled in a new post soon…) are not TRUSTWORTHY…

kabataan, akbayan muna:�For everyone who may chance to read this post: DO NOT ASSUME that since it has been insisted by so many people for so many times that ALAGAD is connected with INC, that the INC will be assumed to automatically support ALAGAD- and use said unfounded assumption against the Church. Stop weaving intricate and separate details together to form a rhetoric such as the one constantly upheld. Example: the “ikapu” allegation (precisely why it is an allegation) is something that has been overtly used to discredit the Church, when in fact WE DO NOT PRACTICE THAT “IKAPU” THING. No one feels negatively compelled nor has it been imposed nevertheless, to extend any monetary offering to the Church. Do not make it a big issue if anyone from the Church refuses to drop some amount during the offering (btw, nobody does, unless you do- that is beyond me).

el_critique:� Yes to everyone�having the chance to read this post: DO NOT ASSUME but rather MEASURE�AND ASSESS what you truly believe in, (Specially the INC members) no matter politically or its leadership… As for the alleged linkage with ALAGAD, why deny the fact? as I said, as long as its objectives are for the people and not INC-exclusive benefits then it will be for a good cause BUT if it is for the INC only, then that is really another issue… as for “ikapu” is concerned… ikapu is undocumented…and ikapu is everywhere… even in that humongous INC spaceship of yours there in QC… (BTW, everybody does, maybe you dont….)

kabataan, akbayan muna:�I know what i’ve written will just be another dust that you will sweep from your way. I am aware of it. What’s my point? exactly what’s yours…

el_critique:��I�will never regard such comments as dust�or trash,�infact,�I would even feature this…(and yes I did… but rather it is the opposite that you will treat this as�trash and I feel somehow you will never react to this but Im hoping you will…)�My point is (for this post only re: alagad) is again, why deny such actions if it would benefit everyone? (you asked what’s your point… well, I have mine, what’s yours? Still thinkin???)

kabataan, akbayan muna:�Brethren are brethren even online.

el_critique:�yes, brethren are brethren, if applied to every single human beings BUT your brethren are chicken, even online…

This entry was posted on Friday, June 15th, 2007 at 8:48 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.